NewsNational News

Actions

President Trump's newest travel ban begins today

TrumpTravenBanBeginsJune2017.mov
<p>For all the talk about President Donald Trump's travel ban, it's still somewhat unfamiliar territory. After all, most presidents don't sign executive orders like the one he signed.</p><p>So, what's the historical basis for the executive order? To understand that, we should take a trip back to 1950.</p><p>That's when Democratic Sen. Pat McCarran <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf" target="_blank">proposed a bill</a> giving the president power to suspend immigration when "the entry of any class of aliens ... into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."</p><p>The president at the time — Harry Truman — wasn't a fan. Even though he and McCarran were both Democrats, Truman vetoed the bill after Congress passed it in 1952.</p><p>McCarran wrote his bill at the height of McCarthyism, when concerns about Communism were running wild in Congress. And McCarran was <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/22/trumps-travel-ban-is-built-on-a-law-meant-to-protect-the-u-s-from-jews-and-communists/?utm_term=.3b2c930f793e" target="_blank">one of the foremost</a> anti-Communist policymakers.</p><p><b>SEE MORE: <a href="http://www.newsy.com/stories/supreme-court-partially-reinstates-trump-s-travel-ban/">The Supreme Court Just Handed Trump His First 'Travel Ban' Win</a></b></p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=14175" target="_blank">Truman's veto</a> rejected that McCarthyism, claiming: "The countries of Eastern Europe have fallen under the communist yoke — they are silenced, fenced off by barbed wire and minefields. ... We do not need to be protected against immigrants from these countries — on the contrary we want to stretch out a helping hand."</p><p>He added: "The idea behind this discriminatory policy was, to put baldly, that Americans with English or Irish names were better people and better citizens than Americans with Italian or Greek or Polish names."</p><p>Congress overrode that veto and the bill became law that June. Six decades later, the immigration debate sounds eerily unchanged.</p><p>Speaking about travel ban, CNN's Fareed Zakaria told viewers: "[Trump] chose to punish ordinary men, women and children who are fleeing terrorism and violence."</p><p>So, did Trump's travel ban overreach the authority set out by the 1952 law? That's a distinction that will now be up to the Supreme Court.</p><hr><b>Trending stories at <a href="http://www.newsy.com">Newsy.com</a></b><ul class="inline-related-links"><li><a href="http://www.newsy.com/stories/trump-accuses-obama-of-collusion-wants-apology/">Trump: Obama 'Colluded Or Obstructed' In Response To Russian Meddling</a></li><li><a href="http://www.newsy.com/stories/russia-won-t-confirm-us-ambassador-kislyak-s-departure/">Is Russia's US Ambassador Stepping Down? Russia Won't Say</a></li><li><a href="http://www.newsy.com/stories/senate-republicans-revise-health-care-bill-add-incentive/">Senate GOP Tweak Health Care Bill Ahead Of Potential Vote</a></li></ul>
Posted
and last updated

After months of winding through the courts, the so-called "watered down," revised version of President Donald Trump's fiercely litigated travel ban will finally go into effect at 8 p.m. ET Thursday.

Here's what to expect for version 2.0:

 

Who can't enter the U.S.?

The test for foreign nationals under the Supreme Court's ruling is whether one has a "credible claim of bona fide relationship" with either an entity (like a school or a job) or a person living in the US (such as a spouse).

If you can't sufficiently establish such a close relationship, you are banned for 90 days if you are from Libya, Syria, Iran, Somalia, Yemen and Sudan, and 120 days if you are a refugee from any country.

The new guidelines, sent to overseas posts on Wednesday, say that applicants must prove a relationship with a parent, spouse, son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law or sibling in the US, according to a senior administration official. They have not yet been posted by the State Department or the Department of Homeland Security and could be subject to change.

Advocacy groups such as Amnesty International plan to send researchers to US airports, such as Dulles International Airport and John F. Kennedy Airport on Thursday, to monitor developments and observe implementation of the ban in case any disputes arise.

Who is exempt from the ban?

Before the executive order was halted by the courts, the following categories of travelers were excluded from the travel ban (and are expected to remain exempt this time around):

-- US citizens -- Legal permanent residents (aka green card holders) -- Current visa holders -- Dual nationals -- Foreign nationals with "bona fide" family, educational or business ties to the US -- In addition, the executive order permits the issuance of a visa to, and entry of, someone who would otherwise be excluded on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of DHS and the State Department.

Homeland Security spokesperson David Lapan confirmed to CNN that the President's revised executive order "would not affect persons who arrive at our ports of entry with legitimate travel documents."

"The professional men and women of DHS expect 'business as usual' at our ports of entry upon implementation of the March 6 EO," he added.

Why is this happening?

The intent behind the executive order was hotly debated for the past several months.

On the campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump called for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims" entering the US.

But the text of the executive order states that "additional scrutiny" is required for foreign nationals traveling from the six identified nations because "the conditions in these countries present heightened threats. Each of these countries is a state sponsor of terrorism, has been significantly compromised by terrorist organizations, or contains active conflict zones."